W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Updated delete tests

From: Matt Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:20:59 -0400
Message-ID: <4CD0103B.5060003@oracle.com>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Greg,

Yes. We should definitely add some more tests for this. I'll try to put 
a few of these in.

- Matt

Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Matt Perry wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Looks like I misunderstood some things. I'll revise the tests to get them in line with the spec.
>>     
>
> Matt,
>
> Regarding the tests you changed (e.g. dawg-delete-01), it seems that you've gotten rid of all the tests that demonstrated the misunderstanding here. I think we should continue to have tests like that (where the DELETE pattern has variables that don't get bound), but with expected results that show that the DELETE operation doesn't end up removing triples based on patterns with unbound variables.
>
> thanks,
> .greg
>
>
>   
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 13:21:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT