Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET)

noted (we might want to discuss shortcuts for BIND along these lines but wouldn't this kind of bring us back to 
whether or not have the same comma-separation in SELECT project expressions or for GROUP BY then? 

apart from that, shall I send the response AS IS for now, or shall I hold back until BIND is settled in the Editor's draft?

Axel

On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> Observation, not proposal:
> 
> BIND (expr1 AS ?x, expr2 AS ?y) would work
> 
> BIND (expr1 AS ?x) is more like the use in SELECT to me - each named
> expression value is enclosed in ().
> 
> Or change SELECT as well.
> 
> I don't see this as important.
> 
>         Andy
> 
> On 17/11/10 14:54, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > alright, changed response draft respectively...
> > check http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1
> >
> > Axel
> >
> >
> > On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:49, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17/11/10 11:35, Steve Harris wrote:
> >>> On 2010-11-17, at 11:28, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:15, Steve Harris wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Seems fine, but is it BIND() BIND() or BIND() ()?
> >>>>
> >>>> not sure as I couldn't find it in the grammar yet, Andy?
> >>>> (I have no strong feelings on either)
> >>>
> >>> BIND() BIND() might leave more syntax options open in the future, but no strong preference.
> >>
> >> BIND is exactly:
> >>
> >> BIND(expr AS ?var)
> >>
> >> A trailing optional expression will have lookahead problems with RDF
> >> list which also starts "("
> >>
> >>          Andy
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Steve
> >>>
> >>>>> It's probably right, just checking the response is correct.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Steve
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2010-11-17, at 10:42, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I put up a draft response for
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Nov/0005.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Let me know whether you're ok with that or whether you think whether we should wait until BIND is specified further in the draft.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Axel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> >>>>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> >>>>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> >>>>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> >>>>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 15:58:23 UTC