W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: draft responce JG-1 (comments on functions and LET)

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:57:52 +0000
Cc: "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F49A23B5-D43F-42E7-82A7-A724C20D8CE8@deri.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
noted (we might want to discuss shortcuts for BIND along these lines but wouldn't this kind of bring us back to 
whether or not have the same comma-separation in SELECT project expressions or for GROUP BY then? 

apart from that, shall I send the response AS IS for now, or shall I hold back until BIND is settled in the Editor's draft?

Axel

On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> Observation, not proposal:
> 
> BIND (expr1 AS ?x, expr2 AS ?y) would work
> 
> BIND (expr1 AS ?x) is more like the use in SELECT to me - each named
> expression value is enclosed in ().
> 
> Or change SELECT as well.
> 
> I don't see this as important.
> 
>         Andy
> 
> On 17/11/10 14:54, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > alright, changed response draft respectively...
> > check http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1
> >
> > Axel
> >
> >
> > On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:49, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17/11/10 11:35, Steve Harris wrote:
> >>> On 2010-11-17, at 11:28, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:15, Steve Harris wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Seems fine, but is it BIND() BIND() or BIND() ()?
> >>>>
> >>>> not sure as I couldn't find it in the grammar yet, Andy?
> >>>> (I have no strong feelings on either)
> >>>
> >>> BIND() BIND() might leave more syntax options open in the future, but no strong preference.
> >>
> >> BIND is exactly:
> >>
> >> BIND(expr AS ?var)
> >>
> >> A trailing optional expression will have lookahead problems with RDF
> >> list which also starts "("
> >>
> >>          Andy
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Steve
> >>>
> >>>>> It's probably right, just checking the response is correct.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Steve
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2010-11-17, at 10:42, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I put up a draft response for
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Nov/0005.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Let me know whether you're ok with that or whether you think whether we should wait until BIND is specified further in the draft.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Axel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> >>>>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> >>>>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> >>>>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> >>>>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 15:58:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT