W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:38:35 -0500
Message-ID: <4D1334BB.70107@thefigtrees.net>
To: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 12/23/2010 4:45 AM, Alexandre Passant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21 Dec 2010, at 13:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> As one step towards Last Call, can we agree that the grammar is complete as is? i.e., we do not intend to change any elements of the grammar beyond decisions that have already been made, whether it by syntax, keywords, functions, or anything else.
>
> Does it also includes grammar for Update ?
> AFAIR there is an outstanding issue about modify_template.

Hi Alex,

What is this outstanding issue?

thanks,
Lee

>
> I'll try to compile Update's remaining issues soon to see if that affects grammar or not.
>
> Alex.
>
>>
>> If you think there is still any outstanding issues that impact on the grammar, please speak up ASAP -- otherwise we'll conclude that it the grammar is complete in a couple of days.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Lee
>>
>
> --
> Dr. Alexandre Passant
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> :me owl:sameAs<http://apassant.net/alex>  .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2010 11:39:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:44 GMT