W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Nov. 9, 2010

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:17:46 +0800
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <18B91B53-242D-496C-BA3B-4C1F9F2B061F@deri.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>

On 10 Nov 2010, at 17:09, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> On 10/11/10 03:41, Alexandre Passant wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 10 Nov 2010, at 02:51, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> Minutes for our short meeting:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-09
>>> [[
>>> 2. update shortcuts
>>> LeeF:
>>> Summary: slight preference in today's group for including shortcuts - motivation is ease of use of language, ease of optimization
>> Is that a formal OK from the group or do we need a vote on that in next telco. ? (as many people were not attending the call)
>> Alex.
> It's Lee's summary of the discussion, which I clipped out to help people catchup (you do read the whole transcript don't you? :-)
> There was a strawpoll of the people present, nothing more.  It needs to come up more formally if you want a WG decision.

Yes, I'd like a more formal decision to see if the group is happy to have the current proposal integrated in the SPARQL Update document.
Can we schedule the vote for the next telco ? I won't be here but Axel could vote on behalf of DERI.
Or should we have a website poll as we've done for the features in the first phase of the group


> 	Andy

Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:19:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:02 UTC