public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2011: by thread

irc/zakim nick name Paul Groth (Sunday, 31 July)
prov-wg mercurial error Timothy Lebo (Saturday, 30 July)
- Re: prov-wg mercurial error Timothy Lebo (Saturday, 30 July)
  - Re: prov-wg mercurial error Luc Moreau (Sunday, 31 July)
PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Saturday, 30 July)
PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Simon Miles (Friday, 29 July)
resolution about pil:Entity/pil:BOB Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-63 (about the example): about the example [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-60: comments on bob [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-60: comments on bob [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-59 (generation-definition): on generation [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-58 (time-iso8601): is reference to iso8601 appropriate? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-54 (which-provenance-is-expected-to-be-retrieved?): What is it we expect to obtain when we say "retrieving the provenance of something" [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 July)
Review of provenance model draft Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: Review of provenance model draft Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Reza B'far (Friday, 29 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Friday, 29 July)
PROV-ISSUE-52 (provenance-source-equal-treatment): why handling provider and third parties differently? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-52 (provenance-source-equal-treatment): why handling provider and third parties differently? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-52 (provenance-source-equal-treatment): why handling provider and third parties differently? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Friday, 29 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Paul Groth (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Paul Groth (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
regrets Deus, Helena (Thursday, 28 July)
Closed Actions Paul Groth (Thursday, 28 July)
PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 28 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Wednesday, 27 July)
relation <--> property Paolo Missier (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: relation <--> property Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 28 July)
Provenance Model (ontology and formal model documentation) Satya Sahoo (Wednesday, 27 July)
PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Wednesday, 27 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik (Wednesday, 27 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Wednesday, 27 July)
PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 27 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Wednesday, 27 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 28 July)
Prov WG Telecon Agenda 28 July 2011 Luc Moreau (Tuesday, 26 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Tuesday, 26 July)
Identity and a thing runnegar@isoc.org (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: Identity and a thing Ryan Golden (Monday, 25 July)
OECD Paper runnegar@isoc.org (Monday, 25 July)
W3C Privacy Interest Group runnegar@isoc.org (Tuesday, 19 July)
- Re: W3C Privacy Interest Group Carl Reed (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: W3C Privacy Interest Group runnegar@isoc.org (Tuesday, 26 July)
    - Re: W3C Privacy Interest Group Carl Reed (Wednesday, 27 July)
blimey! is it just me or someone just kicked the W3C mail server? Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: blimey! is it just me or someone just kicked the W3C mail server? Graham Klyne (Monday, 25 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] martin (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-47 (third-party-provenance): How to obtain provenance from a third party known by the user [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-47 (third-party-provenance): How to obtain provenance from a third party known by the user [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-47 (third-party-provenance): How to obtain provenance from a third party known by the user [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-47 (third-party-provenance): How to obtain provenance from a third party known by the user [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-47 (third-party-provenance): How to obtain provenance from a third party known by the user [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-47 (third-party-provenance): How to obtain provenance from a third party known by the user [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Yogesh Simmhan (Thursday, 28 July)
PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
Meeting Minutes 2011-07-21 Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Sunday, 24 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
  - RE: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Tuesday, 26 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Tuesday, 26 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Tuesday, 26 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Tuesday, 26 July)
PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 24 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Thursday, 28 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 23 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 23 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 23 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-42 (derivation-agent): Derivation should specifically mention agent in its definition [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 23 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 23 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 23 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Sunday, 24 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Jim McCusker (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
PROV-ISSUE-37: Section 3.3 and Section 3.4: on provenance information specified by third-parties [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-37: Section 3.3 and Section 3.4: on provenance information specified by third-parties [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Sunday, 24 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-37: Section 3.3 and Section 3.4: on provenance information specified by third-parties [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 22 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Sunday, 24 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Khalid Belhajjame (Thursday, 28 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Yogesh Simmhan (Thursday, 28 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 28 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-36: Section 3.2: Accessing the provenance of HTML documents [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Yogesh Simmhan (Thursday, 28 July)
Provenance Model draft document Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
irc handle Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Paul Groth (Saturday, 23 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Myers, Jim (Sunday, 24 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-34: Section 4: definition of "Agent" Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 27 July)
PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Monday, 25 July)
PROV-ISSUE-31 (standard-names): what names do we use to refer to the language, ontology, and access/query methods [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 21 July)
PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Friday, 22 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Curt Tilmes (Friday, 22 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik (Saturday, 23 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Daniel Garijo (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Reza B'Far (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Stephan Zednik (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Reza B'Far (Sunday, 24 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Ryan Golden (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Khalid Belhajjame (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Ryan Golden (Monday, 25 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Ryan Golden (Monday, 25 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Monday, 25 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-30 (name-for-bob): What name do we use for the BOB construct? [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
implementation task force plan and telco Deus, Helena (Thursday, 21 July)
Access control for "Implementation Stakeholder Questionnaire Response Report" Sandro Hawke (Thursday, 21 July)
Formal semantics notes James Cheney (Thursday, 21 July)
- Re: Formal semantics notes Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
  - Re: Formal semantics notes James Cheney (Thursday, 21 July)
PAQ draft in W3C repository Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
Planning page for generating the 2nd iteration of the Implementation Stakeholder questionnaire Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 21 July)
Apologies for not attending tomorrow's meeting... Eric Stephan (Thursday, 21 July)
Status of Plan for Report on Results of Implementation Stakeholders Questionnaire Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 21 July)
Prov WG Telecon Agenda 21 July 2011 Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 20 July)
long list of actions Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 20 July)
Blog post on F2F Paul Groth (Saturday, 16 July)
Re: Agent terminology Paul Groth (Friday, 15 July)
simon:ivpOf Ryan Golden (Friday, 15 July)
simon:entity (or Identifiable) Ryan Golden (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Stephan Zednik (Friday, 15 July)
- RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Deus, Helena (Friday, 15 July)
- Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Luc Moreau (Friday, 15 July)
  - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Jim McCusker (Friday, 15 July)
    - RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Friday, 15 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Jim McCusker (Friday, 15 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far (Friday, 15 July)
    - RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Friday, 15 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far (Saturday, 16 July)
    - RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Saturday, 16 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far (Saturday, 16 July)
    - RE: [Spam:***** SpamScore] Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Saturday, 16 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Reza B'Far (Sunday, 17 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Jim McCusker (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Luc Moreau (Thursday, 21 July)
    - RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Friday, 15 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Khalid Belhajjame (Saturday, 16 July)
  - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Ryan Golden (Saturday, 16 July)
- Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Luc Moreau (Friday, 15 July)
  - RE: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Friday, 15 July)
    - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Khalid Belhajjame (Saturday, 16 July)
  - Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Ryan Golden (Saturday, 16 July)
- Re: simon:entity (or Identifiable) Myers, Jim (Tuesday, 19 July)
FW: the nature of a bob (was Re: Models and their use) Myers, Jim (Thursday, 14 July)
re: IVPof proposal (was Re: Models and their use) Myers, Jim (Thursday, 14 July)
Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Agent Sub-Types Yolanda Gil (Thursday, 14 July)
  - Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Daniel Garijo (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Paolo Missier (Monday, 18 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Reza B'Far (Monday, 18 July)
    - Re: Agent Sub-Types Paolo Missier (Monday, 18 July)
- Re: Agent Sub-Types Paul Groth (Tuesday, 19 July)
Fwd: Fwd: Discontinuing UK and FR dial-in numbers for Zakim Paolo Missier (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Fwd: Fwd: Discontinuing UK and FR dial-in numbers for Zakim Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 July)
Bobs, IVP and time intervals Cresswell, Stephen (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 14 July)
  - Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Luc Moreau (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 14 July)
    - RE: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Myers, Jim (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Khalid Belhajjame (Saturday, 16 July)
    - RE: Bobs, IVP and time intervals Myers, Jim (Saturday, 16 July)
Connection to semantic news group Simon Miles (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Connection to semantic news group Eric Stephan (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Connection to semantic news group Simon Miles (Thursday, 14 July)
Prov WG Telecon Agenda 14 July 2011 Paul Groth (Wednesday, 13 July)
Models and their use Simon Miles (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Models and their use Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 July)
  - Re: Models and their use Jim McCusker (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Models and their use Simon Miles (Wednesday, 13 July)
  - RE: Models and their use Myers, Jim (Wednesday, 13 July)
    - Re: Models and their use Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Models and their use Simon Miles (Wednesday, 13 July)
  - RE: Models and their use Myers, Jim (Wednesday, 13 July)
- Re: Models and their use Paul Groth (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Models and their use Simon Miles (Thursday, 14 July)
  - Re: Models and their use Luc Moreau (Thursday, 14 July)
Access plan for next 3 months Simon Miles (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Access plan for next 3 months Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Access plan for next 3 months Paul Groth (Tuesday, 12 July)
change in my email Paul Groth (Monday, 11 July)
Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Ryan Golden (Tuesday, 12 July)
- Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 July)
  - Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Ryan Golden (Tuesday, 12 July)
    - Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 July)
    - Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Reza B'Far (Tuesday, 12 July)
    - Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 13 July)
    - Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Reza B'Far (Wednesday, 13 July)
    - PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Luc Moreau (Thursday, 14 July)
    - RE: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Deus, Helena (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Khalid Belhajjame (Saturday, 16 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far (Saturday, 16 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Khalid Belhajjame (Saturday, 16 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Reza B'Far (Saturday, 16 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Graham Klyne (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Khalid Belhajjame (Thursday, 21 July)
    - Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes? Paul Groth (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Agent terminology (was: PROV-ISSUE-4: agent subtypes?) Graham Klyne (Thursday, 14 July)
- Re: Proposed changes to Process Execution and related concepts Luc Moreau (Thursday, 14 July)
who is who? Luc Moreau (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: who is who? Simon Miles (Monday, 11 July)
  - Re: who is who? Paolo Missier (Monday, 11 July)
- Re: who is who? Paul Groth (Monday, 11 July)
PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 11 July)
Homework for Connection Task Force and Interested Parties! ericphb@gmail.com (Sunday, 10 July)
data transformations named by Ontology for Biomedical Investigations Timothy Lebo (Friday, 8 July)
- Regarding the definition of IVP OF Khalid Belhajjame (Friday, 8 July)
  - RE: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Cresswell, Stephen (Friday, 8 July)
    - RE: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Myers, Jim (Friday, 8 July)
    - Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Luc Moreau (Monday, 11 July)
  - Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Luc Moreau (Monday, 11 July)
    - Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF Paolo Missier (Monday, 11 July)
  - Simplicity (was: Regarding the definition of IVP OF) Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 July)
f2f1 whiteboard image Sandro Hawke (Thursday, 7 July)
Provenance Access Query example Timothy Lebo (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Provenance Access Query example Timothy Lebo (Thursday, 7 July)
  - Re: Provenance Access Query example Timothy Lebo (Saturday, 9 July)
    - Re: Provenance Access Query example Luc Moreau (Monday, 11 July)
    - Re: Provenance Access Query example Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 12 July)
ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 7 July)
- RE: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Myers, Jim (Thursday, 7 July)
  - Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Paul Groth (Thursday, 7 July)
  - Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 July)
    - Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Paolo Missier (Monday, 11 July)
  - Re: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same entity Luc Moreau (Monday, 11 July)
ISSUE-27: Consider ordering of event in model and semantics Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 7 July)
PROV-ISSUE-26 (uses and generates questions): How can one figure out the provenance of a given entity? Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 7 July)
Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan (Thursday, 7 July)
- Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan (Thursday, 7 July)
  - Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Timothy Lebo (Saturday, 9 July)
    - Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan (Saturday, 9 July)
  - Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Yolanda Gil (Wednesday, 13 July)
    - Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Kai Eckert (Thursday, 14 July)
    - Re: Connection Task Force Informal Report Outline Eric Stephan (Thursday, 14 July)
ISSUE-25: Semantics group to incorporate ""derivation" or "partially determined by" relationship could be subjective or context-dependent assertion, not an objectively true or false statement." Derivation issue # 2 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 6 July)
ISSUE-24: Semantic document address "P and things used by P determine values of some of X's invariant properties (less strict)" Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 6 July)
ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 6 July)
ISSUE-22: We lose which entity was used to generate which entity. Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 6 July)
- Re: ISSUE-22: We lose which entity was used to generate which entity. Paul Groth (Thursday, 28 July)
Implementation TF F2F1 Presentation Stephan Zednik (Wednesday, 6 July)
Prov WG F2F Agenda 6-7 July 2011 Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 6 July)
Consolidated Concepts page Pgroth (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Consolidated Concepts page Stian Soiland-Reyes (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Consolidated Concepts page Timothy Lebo (Saturday, 9 July)
  - Re: Consolidated Concepts page Luc Moreau (Sunday, 10 July)
    - Re: Consolidated Concepts page Paolo Missier (Monday, 11 July)
    - Re: Consolidated Concepts page Luc Moreau (Monday, 11 July)
Meeting Minutes 2011-06-30 Luc Moreau (Tuesday, 5 July)
Dietary Requirements for Lunch at Meeting Next Week Sandro Hawke (Friday, 1 July)
Introduction + Comments on Concepts Reza B'Far (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: Implementation Stakeholder questionnaire approval Reza B'Far (Wednesday, 29 June)
- Task forces - brief presentations Paul Groth (Friday, 1 July)
  - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Simon Miles (Friday, 1 July)
    - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Paul Groth (Friday, 1 July)
    - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 5 July)
    - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Satya Sahoo (Tuesday, 5 July)
    - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Deborah L. McGuinness (Tuesday, 5 July)
    - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Satya Sahoo (Tuesday, 5 July)
  - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Eric Stephan (Saturday, 2 July)
  - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Simon Miles (Tuesday, 5 July)
  - Re: Task forces - brief presentations Eric Stephan (Tuesday, 5 July)
- Re: Implementation Stakeholder questionnaire approval Paul Groth (Friday, 1 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-4: Defining Agent using FOAF's definition Reza B'Far (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: assertion language Daniel Garijo (Friday, 1 July)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-7: trying to reach consensus on derivation (deadline: Wednesday midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo (Friday, 1 July)

public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2011 by thread