W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:24:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4E3154F5.4030601@ninebynine.org>
To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
CC: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Jim,

I just took a look at the SADI pages, but I can't find a specification.  There's 
code, training courses, academic papers but AFAICT no actual specification. 
Even best practices should be specified if they're to be recommended - 
especially if we're looking to achieve some level of interoperability between 
users and providers.

It sounds good, but if we're to suggest it I think we need to point at a 
specification.

#g
--

Jim McCusker wrote:
> Another interesting possible suggested access mechanism is SADI, which
> is a native RDF/OWL web service framework, is simple to use and
> implement, and the developers are about pursue the W3C recommendation
> process for it.
> 
> http://sadiframework.org
> 
> Jim
> 
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Khalid Belhajjame
> <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Thanks Graham,
>> khalid
>>
>> On 24/07/2011 08:25, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>> re:
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/8100a2f745df/paq/provenance-access.html
>>>
>>> Agreed, we don't need to be prescriptive.  My intent was to suggest this
>>> as a recommended mechanism, not the only mechanism.  I'll look to clarify
>>> this.
>>>
>>> #g
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 12:59:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT