W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:58:46 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|669a851e1d0279bf05138fc41d82b30en6QFwn08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E3027A6.8020701@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi
The latest version of the document contains an extended example, 
including this suggestion.

Thoughts? Comments?
Luc

On 07/21/2011 07:54 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof  [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/33
>
> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
>
> I notice in the file example that there is a single level of IVPof. It would be good if we can extend the example to have for example IVPof(e2,e0) and IVPof(e6,e2). e6 may be for example:
> bob(e6, [ type: "File", location: "/shared/crime.txt", creator: "Alice", content: "There was a lot of crime in London last month.", comment = "the content of this file does not convey the opinion of the company the author is an employee of"]). In other words, I simply added a new attribute to e2.
>
> Khalid
>
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 14:59:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT