W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:25:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4E2FCB7B.1040004@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org

May I suggest to rename "Ordering of Processes" to "Ordering of process 
executions". It may be longer as an expression, but is clearer.

khalid

On 27/07/2011 08:15, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Paul and Satya,
> Correct. Furthermore, Paolo and I didn't have time to go through this 
> section yet. So, it's very rough!
> Luc
>
> On 07/27/2011 07:51 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi Satya,
>>
>> The editors took latitude in defining the model for purposes of 
>> consistency that's probably the explanation for the divergence
>>
>> Can you suggest your definition reformulated against the current 
>> document.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Paul
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:51, Provenance Working Group Issue 
>> Tracker<sysbot+tracker@w3.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of 
>>> Process [Conceptual Model]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/50
>>>
>>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>>> On product: Conceptual Model
>>>
>>> I am not sure where did we get the currently listed definition of 
>>> "Ordering of Process" - it is neither listed in the original 
>>> provenance concept page [1] nor in the consolidated concepts page [2].
>>>
>>> I had proposed the following definition:
>>> "Ordering of processes execution (in provenance) needs to be modeled 
>>> as a property linking process entities in specific order along a 
>>> particular dimension (temporal or control flow)"
>>>
>>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptOrderingOfProcesses
>>> [2] 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConsolidatedConcepts#Ordering_of_process_execution
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 08:26:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT