W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model]

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:36:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4E2D5539.4040308@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Khalid (I am still losing track of replies)

good idea, I am happy to extend the example if Luc agrees.

-Paolo

On 7/21/11 7:54 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof  [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/33
>
> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
>
> I notice in the file example that there is a single level of IVPof. It would be good if we can extend the example to have for example IVPof(e2,e0) and IVPof(e6,e2). e6 may be for example:
> bob(e6, [ type: "File", location: "/shared/crime.txt", creator: "Alice", content: "There was a lot of crime in London last month.", comment = "the content of this file does not convey the opinion of the company the author is an employee of"]). In other words, I simply added a new attribute to e2.
>
> Khalid
>
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 11:36:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT