PROV-ISSUE-52 (provenance-source-equal-treatment): why handling provider and third parties differently? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/52 Raised by: Luc Moreau On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance Let us assume I have the identifier for the document that I currently hold. Why do we have two different methods to obtain its provenance-uri? HTTP HEAD if we want to obtain provenance-uri(s) from the document provider. SPARQL query if we want to obtain provenance-uri(s) from a third party. Ultimately, it's the same operation (give me provenance-uri(s) for the current document), why two different methods? My view is that we should have a SINGLE operation, whoever we are dealing with, document provider or third party.Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 14:38:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT