W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:41:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4E2FC127.7060103@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Satya,
isRevisionOf(b2,b1,ag)

asserts that b2 is a revision of b1. b2 is indeed a BOB. What's the objection again? sorry I'm confused

-Paolo

On 7/27/11 1:37 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/48
>
> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
> Revision is a new BOB and not a property as defined currently in conceptual model:
>
> isRevisionOf(b2,b1,ag)
>
> The above description is already covered by isDerivedFrom property.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 07:42:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT