W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Provenance Access Query example

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:35:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4E1BF947.8070203@ninebynine.org>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> At the meeting, I was unclear about the purpose of this example.
> It is now very clear, and I like it very much.
> It should be included in the PA(Q) document that we are going to produce.

I think that to say "it should be included" is not quite right here - it makes a 
big pre-judgement about the editorial content of a document whose substantive 
content is arguably still dependent on scenario and terminology discussions.

I would say, rather, that the PAQ document should adequately address (be tested 
against) the example given, among others.

#g
--

> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> On 07/09/2011 07:43 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> prov-wg,
>>
>> Apologies for the first two messages in this chain.
>> I was posting them so that they would end up in the mail archive.
>>
>> Now that they are in the mail archive, they are part of the 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceAccessScenario#Concrete_Example 
>>
>> and we can discuss how the different "access proposals" would apply to 
>> the example.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> WG,
>>>
>>> An additional form of my latest article.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim Lebo
>>>
>>> p.s. - http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceAccessScenario
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <crime.png>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>> WG,
>>>>
>>>> Here is my latest article. Please check out it's provenance and let 
>>>> me know what you think.
>>>>
>>>> <crime.html>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim Lebo
>>>>        
>>>      
>>
>>    
> 
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 07:53:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:37 GMT