www-style@w3.org from March 2010 by author

A.D.

• CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 23 March)

Adam Twardoch (List)

• Re: [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)

Alan Gresley

• Overflow and bidi was (Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-24) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Sunday, 7 March)

Alberto Lepe

• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)
• [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)
• #RRGGBBAA (Wednesday, 10 March)

Alex Mogilevsky

• RE: is there a reference page for -moz-box ? (Thursday, 18 March)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: percentage heights in tables (section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms") (Wednesday, 17 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [css3-lists] Proposal: list item marker from the content of the li element (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Suggest a property for autoresizing textarea (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• [cssom] CSS Value API (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [cssom] comments on value serialization rules (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (wrapping up) (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (wrapping up) (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Tuesday, 2 March)

Anton Prowse

• Re: [CSS21] stack level definitions in 9.9.1 (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: [CSS21] line boxes next to floats in different containing blocks (Wednesday, 24 March)

Arthur Barstow

• Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Thursday, 4 March)

Arve Bersvendsen

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 11 March)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Thursday, 18 March)

ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA

• Suggest a property for autoresizing textarea (Monday, 29 March)

Axel Dahmen

• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Friday, 26 March)
• Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 23 March)

Belov, Charles

• RE: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)

Bert Bos

• [css3-fonts] various comments and typos (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Invalid sample HTML in the spec (Monday, 29 March)
• [CSS21] invalid at-keywords in declaration blocks (issue-71) (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] <family-name> ambiguous - partially quoted names allowed? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: ol style - a number in a circle (Wednesday, 10 March)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3] Specificity mechanism issue (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Select elements based on text content (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Select elements based on text content (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSS 2.1] How to handle rectangle values. (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Wednesday, 3 March)
• RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Tuesday, 2 March)

Brad Kemper

• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] character-transform and vertical-align (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: is there a reference page for -moz-box ? (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Monday, 15 March)
• css backgrounds and borders: odd note (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and also border-radius (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and also border-radius (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (was: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position' (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: ol style - a number in a circle (Monday, 1 March)

Brendan Kenny

• Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Tuesday, 2 March)

Bruno Fassino

• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [CSS21] 10.1 Containing block for absolute elements with inline-level nearest positioned ancestor (Tuesday, 16 March)

Chris Marrin

• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)

Christoph Päper

• [CSS3-Values] Get Width of Styled Text (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] <family-name> ambiguous - partially quoted names allowed? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)

Christopher Slye

• Re: font-variant-caps: all-small-caps (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] various comments and typos (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 11 March)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [css3-selectors] :nth-child() argument and comments (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] action 38, CSS Variables (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] action 38, CSS Variables (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Sunday, 21 March)
• [css3-selectors] :nth-child() argument and comments (Thursday, 18 March)
• positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 11 March)
• CSS 3 Transforms in IE? (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Wednesday, 3 March)
• vendor prefixes considered harmful (was: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Tuesday, 2 March)
• [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: ol style - a number in a circle (Monday, 1 March)

David Chambers

• Re: Select elements based on text content (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Select elements based on text content (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Select elements based on text content (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Select elements based on text content (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)

David Singer

• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Thursday, 18 March)

Dean Jackson

• Re: transitions vs. animations (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-10 (Saturday, 13 March)
• Re: [animations] fill modes, revised (Tuesday, 9 March)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: [animations] fill modes, revised (Wednesday, 3 March)

Erik Dahlstrom

• Agenda for public-fx telcon March 11, 2010 (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-24 (Wednesday, 3 March)

fantasai

• Re: CSS 2.1 text-align:justify issue [CSS2.1] [css3-text] (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-24 (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] new editor's draft of CSS3 Fonts spec (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [Bulk] Re: Counter-increment is not clear in CSS21 and CSS3 (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] <family-name> ambiguous - partially quoted names allowed? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] <family-name> ambiguous - partially quoted names allowed? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• [css3-fonts] character-transform and vertical-align (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Tuesday, 23 March)
• [css3-values] Computed Values definition wrong (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSS21] line boxes next to floats in different containing blocks (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Bibliography typos (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Section 10.8 on line-height and vertical-align should have schemas and examples (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Monday, 22 March)
• [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements (Thursday, 18 March)
• CSS2.1 Test Suite Alpha 2 Published (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-10 (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (Wednesday, 3 March)
• [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-03 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Wednesday, 3 March)

fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net

• Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects) (Tuesday, 30 March)

François REMY

• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)

Gabriele Romanato

• Re: Select elements based on text content (Monday, 29 March)

Gerson Azevedo Goulart Macedo

• [CSS3 general Grammar] (Wednesday, 3 March)

Glen

• Single-line comments (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (was: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties) (Friday, 19 March)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Invalid sample HTML in the spec (Tuesday, 30 March)

Håkon Wium Lie

• [css3-gcpm] updated editor's draft (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3-values] Computed Values definition wrong (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: [css3-values] Computed Values definition wrong (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)

Ian Hickson

• Re: bidi embedding for block-level elements (Wednesday, 17 March)

Jens O. Meiert

• Re: [css3] Specificity mechanism issue (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3] Specificity mechanism issue (Wednesday, 31 March)

John Daggett

• Re: [css21] Make font weight mapping rules normative (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [CSS3-Values] Get Width of Styled Text (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css21] Make font weight mapping rules normative (Tuesday, 30 March)
• [css21] Make font weight mapping rules normative (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Kerning in latest CSS3 draft (Friday, 26 March)
• [css3-fonts] new editor's draft of CSS3 Fonts spec (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: superiors, inferiors, ordinals, etc. (was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17) (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: superiors, inferiors, ordinals, etc. (was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17) (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: superiors, inferiors, ordinals, etc. (was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17) (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] character-transform and vertical-align (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] proposal for 'font-size-adjust: auto' (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• [css3-fonts] font feature fallback examples (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps (Monday, 1 March)

John Hudson

• Re: [css3-fonts] various comments and typos (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: superiors, inferiors, ordinals, etc. (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Kerning in latest CSS3 draft (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: superiors, inferiors, ordinals, etc. (was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17) (Thursday, 25 March)
• superiors, inferiors, ordinals, etc. (was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17) (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)

Jonathan Kew

• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)

Kenneth Christiansen

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Friday, 26 March)

Krzysztof Maczyński

• Invalid sample HTML in the spec (Monday, 29 March)

L. David Baron

• Re: [css3-values] Computed Values definition wrong (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Position of list-item markers (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [CSS21] Height of cell box should not be influenced by 'height' (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] <family-name> ambiguous - partially quoted names allowed? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-selectors] :nth-child() argument and comments (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] proposal for 'font-size-adjust: auto' (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] proposal for 'font-size-adjust: auto' (Friday, 19 March)
• [css3-fonts] proposal for 'font-size-adjust: auto' (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css21] Escaping commas in unquoted URIs (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (was: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties) (Wednesday, 3 March)

Lars Gunther

• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Monday, 29 March)
• Are CSS animations a done deal? (Sunday, 28 March)

Leif Arne Storset

• Re: [gradients] basics (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-24 (Wednesday, 3 March)

Levantovsky, Vladimir

• RE: Kerning in latest CSS3 draft (Friday, 26 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Tuesday, 16 March)

Markus Ernst

• Re: [css3-lists] Proposal: list item marker from the content of the li element (Wednesday, 31 March)
• CSS3 reference (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3-lists] Proposal: list item marker from the content of the li element (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: [css3-lists] Proposal: list item marker from the content of the li element (Wednesday, 31 March)
• [css3-lists] Proposal: list item marker from the content of the li element (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Thursday, 18 March)
• CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Wednesday, 17 March)

Matthew Millar

• RE: ol style - a number in a circle (Monday, 1 March)
• ol style - a number in a circle (Saturday, 27 February)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Saturday, 20 March)
• Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Sunday, 7 March)

MURAKAMI Shinyu

• Re: Feature queries (was Proposal: writing-mode media feature) (Monday, 29 March)
• Feature queries (was Proposal: writing-mode media feature) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-text-layout][css3-mediaqueries] Proposal: writing-mode media feature (Sunday, 21 March)
• [css3-text-layout][css3-mediaqueries] Proposal: writing-mode media feature (Saturday, 20 March)

Nikita Popov

• Re: Select elements based on text content (Monday, 29 March)

Patrick Garies

• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Sunday, 28 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: ol style - a number in a circle (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: ol style - a number in a circle (Wednesday, 3 March)

Paul Duffin

• [css3-selectors] Omitting of universal selector (Tuesday, 9 March)

Peter Moulder

• Re: percentage heights in tables (section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms") (Wednesday, 17 March)
• percentage heights in tables (section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms") (Wednesday, 17 March)

Philippe Wittenbergh

• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)

Richard Fink

• RE: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Sunday, 21 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Saturday, 20 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Saturday, 20 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 18 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Monday, 15 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Wednesday, 10 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-variant-numeric (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Tuesday, 2 March)

Robert Stam

• [CSS 2.1] How to handle rectangle values. (Thursday, 4 March)
• [CSS 2.1] Actual value of a property (Thursday, 4 March)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)

sam

• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Feature queries (was Proposal: writing-mode media feature) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Saturday, 20 March)
• [CSS21] section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms" (Tuesday, 16 March)

Sergey Malkin

• RE: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Tuesday, 9 March)

Simon Fraser

• Re: [css3-gcpm] updated editor's draft (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Are CSS animations a done deal? (Monday, 29 March)
• Appropriate subject lines (Was: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17) (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [animations] fill modes, revised (Tuesday, 2 March)
• [animations] fill modes, revised (Tuesday, 2 March)

Stewart Brodie

• Re: [CSSOM] CSSRule.NAMESPACE_RULE (Friday, 12 March)

Sylvain Galineau

• Re: [CSS21] stack level definitions in 9.9.1 (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Monday, 22 March)
• RE: [css21] border shorthand syntax typo ? (Saturday, 20 March)
• [css21] border shorthand syntax typo ? (Friday, 19 March)
• RE: [css21] Escaping commas in unquoted URIs (Wednesday, 17 March)
• [css21] Escaping commas in unquoted URIs (Wednesday, 17 March)
• RE: CSS 3 Transforms in IE? (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• RE: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Thursday, 4 March)
• RE: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Wednesday, 3 March)
• [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Wednesday, 3 March)
• RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Tuesday, 2 March)
• RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties (Tuesday, 2 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [css3-lists] Proposal: list item marker from the content of the li element (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: [css21] Make font weight mapping rules normative (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Select elements based on text content (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: Select elements based on text content (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Saturday, 27 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment (HTML+CSS) (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css2.1] [css3-fonts] <family-name> ambiguous - partially quoted names allowed? (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-03-17 (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (was: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties) (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Sunday, 21 March)
• Re: Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css3-text-layout][css3-mediaqueries] Proposal: writing-mode media feature (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: Fw: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients (recommended but undefined) (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: transitions vs. animations (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Saturday, 20 March)
• Re: [css21] border shorthand syntax typo ? (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] proposal for 'font-size-adjust: auto' (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] proposal for 'font-size-adjust: auto' (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] 'column-rule-color' values, allowed and initial (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: CSS3 Values and Units: Some proposals (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 18 March)
• Background-repeat:extend (for gradients) (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: positioning and sizing an element relatively to any other element (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: percentage heights in tables (section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms") (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: percentage heights in tables (section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms") (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [gradients] basics (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: [CSS21] section 17.5.3 of the CSS2.1 spec on "table height algorithms" (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: CSS 3 Transforms in IE? (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and also border-radius (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-background] background-shorthand and its background-clip side-effect (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-24 (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: vendor prefixes considered harmful (was: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties) (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: [animations] fill modes, revised (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: [animations] fill modes, revised (Tuesday, 2 March)

Thomas Phinney

• Re: [css21] Make font weight mapping rules normative (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Kerning in latest CSS3 draft (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: Kerning in latest CSS3 draft (Friday, 26 March)
• Kerning in latest CSS3 draft (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: bolder/lighter defintion (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: ol style - a number in a circle (Wednesday, 3 March)

Xavier Mouton-Dubosc

• Suggestion for generic CSS vendor prefix (Sunday, 21 March)

Zack Weinberg

• Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation (Thursday, 25 March)

Øyvind Stenhaug

• Re: [css3-values] Computed Values definition wrong (Friday, 26 March)
• Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: [css21] border shorthand syntax typo ? (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] 'column-rule-color' values, allowed and initial (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Thursday, 18 March)
• [css3-multicol] 'column-rule-color' values, allowed and initial (Thursday, 18 March)
• [css3-multicol] Typos and related issues (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [css21][css3-background] background-position examples conflict with prose/grammar (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-24 (Monday, 1 March)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 23:36:32 UTC