- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:22:47 -0500
- To: rfink@readableweb.com
- Cc: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Richard Fink <rfink@readableweb.com> wrote: > However, in an earlier post, Robert O'Callahan reported: >>By default, Firefox will apply kerning for font sizes at or over a certain > threshold (20 device pixels, currently). > In other words, there is a threshold of 20 device pixels in place, below > which the equivalent of "font-kerning:none" takes effect. > Will other UA's automatically follow suit? Should they? Don't know. But to > ensure that UA's consistently meet author's expectations the question seems > to be: does "the meaning" of default/normal need to be more tightly defined? When we have UA-specific behavior like this, the convention seems to be to use 'auto' rather than 'normal', right? 'normal' implies determinism in the application of the property. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 00:28:45 UTC