- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:16:42 +0100
- To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:40:57 +0100, Sylvain Galineau
<sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> From: Øyvind Stenhaug [mailto:oyvinds@opera.com]
>
>
>> That seems more ambiguous, and the presumably intended interpretation
>> ("exactly one value is not a keyword") is wrong since it wouldn't say
>> how to interpret e.g. "background-position: 10px 40px".
>
> I'm not sure whether it's *more* ambiguous since the prose never
> addressed this case explicitly either.
The case "at least one value is not a keyword" includes the case where
both values are lengths. Two counts as "at least one".
> How about:
>
> #If one value is specified, the second value is assumed to be 'center'.
> #If two values are specified then the first value represents the
> horizontal
> #position (or offset) and the second represents the vertical position
> (or offset).
> #If both values are keywords, the vertical and horizontal components can
> #be specified in any order.
Because the "at least one value is not a keyword" part is omitted, the two
previous sentences kind of contradict each other. Personally I'd still
prefer my last suggestion.
> #If three or four value are given....
--
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 16:51:27 UTC