- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:01:48 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:29 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What's the value in expanding CSS's ability to style frames, though? >> We don't want to encourage their use > > You don't, and a lot of other frames-haters don't, but I don't see that it > should br the role of this WG to discourage the use of particular element of > valid, non-deprecated HTML because of the design challenges associated with > them. It is within our purview to see if there are reasonable ways to allow > CSS styling of such elements in a way that is intuitive and predictable (in > as much as we do with other replaced elements), instead of relying on the > markup language only to do so. It is deprecated, though. <frame> and <frameset> are explicitly *not* in the Elements of HTML chapter of HTML5, and instead are described in the Obsolete Features chapter as a requirement for browsers in order to correctly render legacy content. It's really not worth our time or effort to work on this, imo. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 27 March 2010 16:02:35 UTC