Re: Are CSS animations a done deal?

On Mar 29, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is that, if the end result is the same? Why not let the authors choose whatever means makes the most sense to them?
> 
> Obviously we're not going to "stop" authors from doing anything.
> 
> We are allowed to make recommendations, such as recommending that authors use CSS instead of the <font> element.

That seems like a reasonable approach. 

> Flash-ad-style animations shouldn't be in CSS, since the animation is an essential part of the content.


Agreed.