- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:39:56 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> I'd describe that as the grammar *disagreeing*, since the grammar
> says that commas are allowed in the production for unquoted URIs
> (they're part of the range *-~).
Yes, my bad.
> Likewise, the tokenization in section 4.1, which is significantly
> more important than the appendix G grammar, also (like the grammar
> in appendix G) says that commas are allowed.
Great.
> I agree with this proposal to change 4.3.4, since that would make it
> match both grammars (4.1 and G) and implementations.
>
> > And in Appendix G:
> >
> > url ([!#$%&*\~,]|{nonascii}|{escape})
>
> And I disagree with the proposal to change the grammar to make it
> not match implementations. (I'm also not quite sure what you meant
> to type in that proposal.)
You may disregard this part.
Thanks !
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 23:40:32 UTC