W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010


From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:03:58 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u9f54wxc64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:54:06 +0100, Daniel Glazman  
<daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> Le 02/03/10 14:37, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
>> I guess... And we expose @import in the same silly way too. Blurp. It is
>> a mess.
> You have a suggestion to expose @import differently? I'd love to
> read that...

Well, in retrospect I think that various syntactic constructs such as  
namespaces and imports should have been exposed on the CSSStyleSheet  
object instead. E.g. all @import rules could just be  
CSSStyleSheet.importedStyleSheets which returns a StyleSheetList. It is  
too late now though.

Anyway, I have changed NAMESPACE_RULE to use constant 8 instead. Having  
said that, I noticed Firefox uses 0 currently. We could use that as well.  
(0 and 2 can be re-allocated.)

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 12 March 2010 09:04:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:43 UTC