- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:26:08 -0400
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Friday 2010-03-19 16:58 -0700, Simon Fraser wrote: > > For example, I could imagine merging the properties as follows: > > > > * combine animation-name and transition-property using a functional > > syntax, like: > > animation-???: transition(color), keyframes(wobble) > > where 'animation-???: transition(color)' == 'transition-property: color' > > and 'animation-???: keyframes(wobble)' == 'animation-name: wobble' > > > > * make animation-duration, animation-delay, and > > animation-timing-function (and maybe also animation-play-state, > > if it's kept) apply to both types of animations (keyframe and > > transition) > > But this prevents you from using a different duration for the transition and > animation. I don't think it does, since the normal use would be via the shorthand, and all the properties are comma-separated lists: animation: keyframes(wobble) 2s 3, transition(color) 6s; (Again, an additive cascade would be helpful here, but that's also true of animations and transitions on their own.) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2010 02:26:39 UTC