- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:15:23 -0500
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/2/10 5:57 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > -w3c-background-origin: border-box; > > But if you then switched to an earlier implementation that was based on an older > draft [2], that browser would expect : > > -w3c-background-origin: border; > > You couldn't just specify both; as both browsers key off the same property name, only > one of them would win and do what's expected. Actually, assuming the browsers involved discard unknown declarations like they're supposed to, this would work (in either order, even): -w3c-background-origin: border-box; -w3c-background-origin: border; But in a situation in which the meaning of the syntax changed without changing the allowed value set you would be absolutely correct. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 23:16:00 UTC