>> No, you've missed how bolder/lighter works, the inherited weight is >> first mapped to an existing weight and *then* bolder/lighter is >> applied. > > I thought the point of your proposal was that you were making this no > longer be the case (which I like). The table of values is based on how the *existing* behavior of bolder/lighter would work for a family with 100/400/700/900 weights. For that family '300 bolder lighter' would be a roundtrip using either the old definition or the new one. After the change, bolder/lighter would be a simple mapping independent of a given family.Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:42:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:44 UTC