- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:31:01 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 03/03/10 19:27, L. David Baron a écrit : > On Wednesday 2010-03-03 10:14 +0100, Daniel Glazman wrote: >> I said it in the past and I maintain my opinion: the vendor prefixes >> as we manage them in CSS don't make sense. We have >> border-radius and border-image interoperable enough so web authors copy >> precisely styles only changing the prefix. That gives stylesheets that > > Well, in the case of border-image, Gecko and WebKit may have > interoperable behavior, but it no longer agrees with the spec. So > we have a good bit of work to do before we rename -moz-border-image > to border-image. But I make a strong difference between border-image and border-radius: the latter is already used by zillions of pages, not the former... </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 06:31:34 UTC