- From: Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:26:06 +0900
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mar 18, 2010, at 1:53 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> 1) Clarify, in the gradients section of the Images module, that
> gradients are, by default, still finitely-sized images with edges and
> intrinsic dimensions equal to the 'box' specified in the gradient
> section. This makes the current Firefox behavior wrt gradients
> conformant. You can see this behavior with the following test-case:
>
> <div id=foo></div>
> <style>
> #foo {
> width: 200px;
> height: 200px;
> margin: 50px;
> border: 3px solid black;
> background: -moz-linear-gradient(left, red, blue) gray;
> background-position: 100px;
> }
> </style>
>
> Firefox 3.6 renders the gradient as a 200px by 200px image, and then
> moves it 100px over, leaving an area not covered by a background image
> and revealing the background-color underneath.
FWIW, Gecko trunk (1.9.3a4pre) has a different behaviour here, one that matches what WebKit does:
The 'image' is offset by 100px to the right, but repeated. The background-color is not visible.
testcase
http://dev.l-c-n.com/CSS3_border-background/background-repeat-gradient.html
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 08:14:59 UTC