- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, www-style@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
>> Note that this legacy behavior is *not* triggered in the absence of >> the feature in the system fonts, it is only triggered in the absence >> of support for the character-transform property itself. > > I didn't realize that. Now i'm confused. So... What happens to SUP if > the UA supports character-transform, but the system fonts don't have > the feature (and the font is not embedded)? I imagined it _would_ use > the font-size, etc. as fallbacks. No, go back and look at the wording I wrote up, the fallback when character-transform is supported is more akin to the way fake small-caps are simulated. This hopefully avoids the artifacts of line-height/baseline fiddling in current clients as I think you've mentioned you dislike. John
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:51:05 UTC