>> Note that this legacy behavior is *not* triggered in the absence of >> the feature in the system fonts, it is only triggered in the absence >> of support for the character-transform property itself. > > I didn't realize that. Now i'm confused. So... What happens to SUP if > the UA supports character-transform, but the system fonts don't have > the feature (and the font is not embedded)? I imagined it _would_ use > the font-size, etc. as fallbacks. No, go back and look at the wording I wrote up, the fallback when character-transform is supported is more akin to the way fake small-caps are simulated. This hopefully avoids the artifacts of line-height/baseline fiddling in current clients as I think you've mentioned you dislike. JohnReceived on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:51:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:43 UTC