- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:09:18 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Hi Daniel, thanks for your comments! On Mar 10, 2010, at 17:57 , Daniel Glazman wrote: > 1. Overall, it's a good a light document. I agree the feature is needed. Glad that you think so. > 2. I don't understand why this is restricted to Widgets... > A HTML page can be dropped on a desktop or be rendered chromeless > by Mozilla Prism. A web page can be rendered in a browser in > fullscreen mode, etc. All values still make sense in the case of > a browser. > I think this spec should be made app-agnostic and Widgets should not > be the only target. I don't see why that would be an issue. Do you see the need to change anything (other than some terminology) in the draft to achieve that? > 3. why "maxiMIZED" and only "mini"? Hmmm, because they were added at different times? :) It's a good point, is there a preference between -mized or not? > 4. I think a "hidden" value makes sense for future system use of > webapps... Don't say no immediately and think more about it please. I'm not saying no, but could you just clarify a little bit what you have in mind for this? If it's not an immediate use case, the keyword can be added later too. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 17:09:50 UTC