On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:06:02 +0100, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Thursday 2010-02-18 15:00 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >I'm not particularly committed to keeping it that way, though. >> >However, I'm somewhat concerned about the idea of switching to >> >#rrggbb notation since rgb() can handle out-of-sRGB values whereas >> >#rrggbb cannot. (Gecko doesn't currently implement that, but I'd >> >like to.) >> >> And then sometimes serialize to percentages? Or would you propose a >> change to the rgb() syntax as well? My main gripe here is <canvas> >> which uses #rrggbb and IE, which also uses #rrggbb (though I should >> probably test that again to be sure). > > rgb() allows rgb(300,-10,300). Ah right, I see. So the problem is that <canvas> does not support this at all. It serializes color values using the #rrggbb notation and the CanvasPixelArray is 8-bit bound. I don't really know enough about it to make a good call here I think, but the options as I see them are 1) accept that color components are limited to 8 bits and be compatible with <canvas>; 2) fix <canvas> somehow (how?); 3) accept that <canvas> has limitations. (IE does not appear to use #rrggbb for currentStyle after all.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 10:12:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:39 UTC