On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > If there is a problem we need to solve here, it's that for some properties > there's a long gap between the syntax and behavior freezing and the spec > going into CR, at which time unprefixed implementations are officially > allowed. Fixing that requires a change in policy and/or process. So does anyone have a specific proposal on how to fix this? What would be an appropriate procedure to freeze syntax for a given property and allow unprefixed use? There have been some fairly specific suggestions from the "introduce a shared prefix" camp, but no one has come up with an actual proposal for dropping prefixes sooner (that I've seen). This is a real problem, and a solution is needed.Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:07:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:43 UTC