- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:02:18 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/31/10 2:39 AM, fantasai wrote: > | 1.3 If a child C of a tabular container P is an anonymous inline box > | that contains only white space, and its immediately preceding > | and following siblings, if any, are proper table descendants of P > | and are either 'table-caption' or internal table boxes, > | then it is treated as if it had 'display: none'. > | A box D is a proper table descendant of A if D can be a descendant > | of A without causing the generation of any intervening 'table' or > | 'inline-table' boxes. > | [current rule 5, adjusted to match bz] > | 1.4 If a box B is an anonymous inline containing only white space, and > | it has two immediate siblings both of which are internal table boxes, > | then it is treated as if it had 'display: none'. > [new] Still thinking through this, but why is rule 1.3 needed given rule 1.4? And shouldn't table-caption be mentioned in rule 1.4? -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:02:53 UTC