- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:27:13 -0800
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/04/2010 01:23 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com > <mailto:jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>> wrote: > > On 4 Mar 2010, at 13:30, Christoph Päper wrote: > > 6.1 font-kerning: normal | inherit | enabled | disabled > > > > There are few properties that use generic on/off state names like > ‘enabled’ and ‘disabled’. I would prefer not to see more of them, > but I do not know which pair of words would be better here, ‘kern’/? > perhaps. > > I'd be happy to hear alternative suggestions, although as the draft > does not currently include font-kerning as one of the properties > controllable via the font shorthand, I don't think the generic > "enabled" and "disabled" are particularly problematic here. > > How about just naming them 'kerning' and 'no-kerning'? If 'font-kerning: > kerning' is too weird, perhaps rename 'font-kerning' to > 'font-glyph-spacing'? I'd go with font-kerning: normal | kern | no-kern ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 22:27:50 UTC