Re: CSS3: Suggestion for another list-style-type

> Once everyone properly supports the existing ::marker pseudoelement
> and content properties, you can do this without any special
> intervention:
>
> li::marker {
>  content: "»";
> }


I see... From new discussion in the newsgroup I read that the above rule 
would be insufficient. It was said to be:

ul
  {list-style-type: none;
  }

li::marker
  {content: "»";
  }

What is correct then?

Still, wouldn't it be more appropriate to allow <string> values for the 
list-style-type property? Why separating this value from all the other 
predefined values allowed on list-style-type?

Cheers,
Axel Dahmen 

Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:46:57 UTC