W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Are CSS animations a done deal?

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:20:04 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306601003292020q5201e133kc0b6e204e6074458@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why is that, if the end result is the same? Why not let the authors choose
> whatever means makes the most sense to them?

Obviously we're not going to "stop" authors from doing anything.

We are allowed to make recommendations, such as recommending that authors
use CSS instead of the <font> element.

Flash-ad-style animations shouldn't be in CSS, since the animation is an
essential part of the content.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 03:20:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:44 UTC