- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:19:20 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:38:02 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > FWIW, since it is pretty clear animation is going to happen I'm happy to > make NAMESPACE_RULE 10 instead. I really couldn't care less. We could > also make it 2, but it seems some people are less happy with that at > this point. (Though @charset really never should have been allocated a > constant and corresponding object...) I made it 10. Hopefully this is agreeable to everyone. I added a note about 9 and 10 being reserved for CSS animation. As for this system not working, I don't know, but since introducing new at-rules affects parsing and processing of style sheets, affects the insertRule method on CSSStyleSheet and CSSMediaRule, affects the cssText attribute on CSSRule, and affects constants on CSSRule, in addition to it requiring the introduction of new interfaces, this needs to be a coordinated effort. Truly private extensions can make use of constants outside the first 1001. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 15:19:55 UTC