W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Are CSS animations a done deal?

From: Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:51:26 +0900
Message-ID: <8c9249b71003291751t2d278e6cu5b6219f19a4451d6@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Lars Gunther <gunther@keryx.se> wrote:
> 2010-03-29 23:16, Robert O'Callahan skrev:
>> My personal opinion is that CSS Animation makes sense for presentational
>> animations, but I don't want to see CSS Animation used for animations
>> that are essentially animated images (like most Flash ads).
> Mark my words. That will happen!
> To many "ninjas", too many "clever" people, too much incentive!
> --
> Lars Gunther
> http://keryx.se/
> http://twitter.com/itpastorn/
> http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/

Lars, I agree with you. Having CSS animations is pretty cool - Its
very good to have other way to animate elements without using
Javascript or Flash - but I think they should be declared elsewhere,
not in the CSS as in "style".

IMHO it could be better if they can be included and declared something like:

<link href="anims.csa" rel="animation" type="text/csa" media="screen" />

I think having a different categorization will allow a better
implementation for controlling/stopping animations in the browser.

Just my opinion, don't take it too serious.

With the current idea, I wonder what is suppose to happen with the CSS
animations in media="print" ? does the browser would turn it off
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 00:52:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:44 UTC