On Tuesday 2010-03-23 16:23 -0700, fantasai wrote: > The problem with this proposal is that it doesn't roundtrip very well. > If I start at 300 and go bolder, then lighter, I don't get back to my Is there a use case for that? Is lighter inside bolder something we expect to be common? In what cases? Do they rely on this invariant? On Tuesday 2010-03-23 19:11 -0700, John Daggett wrote: > No, you've missed how bolder/lighter works, the inherited weight is > first mapped to an existing weight and *then* bolder/lighter is applied. I thought the point of your proposal was that you were making this no longer be the case (which I like). -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:25:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:39 UTC