- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:24:39 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday 2010-03-23 16:23 -0700, fantasai wrote: > The problem with this proposal is that it doesn't roundtrip very well. > If I start at 300 and go bolder, then lighter, I don't get back to my Is there a use case for that? Is lighter inside bolder something we expect to be common? In what cases? Do they rely on this invariant? On Tuesday 2010-03-23 19:11 -0700, John Daggett wrote: > No, you've missed how bolder/lighter works, the inherited weight is > first mapped to an existing weight and *then* bolder/lighter is applied. I thought the point of your proposal was that you were making this no longer be the case (which I like). -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:25:10 UTC