- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:36:33 -0600
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:20 am, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> It appears that backwards fill is just a convenience, and could be >> approximated by baking the delay into the first keyframe? I'm just >> making sure I understand it correctly. > > If you only iterate once, that's true. However, if you want the animation to repeat, then you don't have the luxury of extending the first keyframe. > > We'd like to keep the behavior of "delay" as it applies to transitions and animations to be similar; in both cases, it postpones the start of the effect some time into the future, so we think the behavior of animation-fill-mode as it relates to animation-delay is appropriate. Ah, indeed. Makes sense, then. I support these additions. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 18:37:25 UTC