On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:20 am, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> It appears that backwards fill is just a convenience, and could be >> approximated by baking the delay into the first keyframe? I'm just >> making sure I understand it correctly. > > If you only iterate once, that's true. However, if you want the animation to repeat, then you don't have the luxury of extending the first keyframe. > > We'd like to keep the behavior of "delay" as it applies to transitions and animations to be similar; in both cases, it postpones the start of the effect some time into the future, so we think the behavior of animation-fill-mode as it relates to animation-delay is appropriate. Ah, indeed. Makes sense, then. I support these additions. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 18:37:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:38 UTC