- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:06:20 +0100
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Øyvind Stenhaug wrote:
> 2)
> It would be nice to have sub-headings for 'column-fill' and
> 'break-before'/'break-after'/'break-inside' so the property names show up
> in the ToC
Agreed.
> 3)
> Example III:
> "but the number and widths"
> should be
> "both the number and widths"
Yes.
> 4)
> 2. The multi-column model, third paragraph:
> "if the appear; column rows only appear between columns that both have
> content."
> should be
> "if they appear; column rules only appear between columns that both have
> content."
Indeed. Nice catch.
> 5)
> Examples VIII through X and XX through XXIV:
> These don't look right on my system, the text is too big and overflows all
> over the place. I don't have Arial installed and it seems the figures
> depend on particular font metrics for the hardcoded linebreaks to occur at
> appropriate points. Probably images should be used instead.
Right. (And it's probably a bit too early to depend on webfonts to ensure
the availability of the same font.)
> 7)
> 4.5. 'column-rule', Value entry
> "<column-rule-width>"
> should probably be
> "<'column-rule-width'>"
Yes.
> and I guess it makes sense for the other options to similarly refer to the
> individual column-rule-* properties too
That adds one level of indirection, but the indirection is local to
this spec so it's probably an improvement.
> and for the previous two
> subsections to refer to nonterminals without apostrophes i.e.
> column-rule-style using <border-style> and column-rule-width using
> <border-width>
Yes.
I've updated the editor's version:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-multicol/
(Images haven't been made, though)
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 12:06:56 UTC