w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from April 2002 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• Re: Schema comments Dan Brickley
• Schema comments Graham Klyne
• Publication of the New Working Draft - RDF Schema Eric Miller
• Re: Primer - review: WG please advise/comment! Graham Klyne
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri Graham Klyne
• user-defined datatype (facet) support needed? Dan Connolly
• Re: schema Frank Manola
• Re: schema Dan Brickley
• Re: schema Frank Manola
• RDF Schema WD, publication request looming Dan Brickley

Monday, 29 April 2002

• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Pat Hayes
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Pat Hayes
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Pat Hayes
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Pat Hayes
• Re: schema Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri Aaron Swartz
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Brian McBride
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Brian McBride
• New Working Draft available: RDF Model Theory Eric Miller
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Dan Brickley
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Jeremy Carroll
• Re: schema Dan Brickley
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: schema Graham Klyne
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Patrick Stickler
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Patrick Stickler
• New Working Drafts available: RDF Test Cases and RDF Primer Eric Miller
• Re: Primer - review: WG please advise/comment! Frank Manola

Monday, 29 April 2002

• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Primer - review Graham Klyne
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri Aaron Swartz
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Brian McBride
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Pat Hayes
• better MT draft Pat Hayes
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Jos De_Roo
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Brian McBride
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Graham Klyne
• Re: Informal f2f in Honolulu? Dave Beckett
• Reviewing Model Theory Graham Klyne
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Schema. (fwd) Frank Manola
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Graham Klyne
• Re: status update: webont request for dark triples Graham Klyne
• Re: Schema. (fwd) Graham Klyne
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri Graham Klyne
• Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change Graham Klyne
• schema vs ontology Graham Klyne
• Re: test cases review Brian McBride
• test cases review Jan Grant
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Patrick Stickler
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Patrick Stickler
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Patrick Stickler
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Brian McBride
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Brian McBride
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... Patrick Stickler
• Re: A test case Patrick Stickler
• Re: Informal f2f in Honolulu? Patrick Stickler
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 28 April 2002

• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Clarification of charmod-uri Aaron Swartz
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Aaron Swartz
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Brian McBride
• Re: Informal f2f in Honolulu? Aaron Swartz
• rdfms-contexts proposed resolution Aaron Swartz
• rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance proposed resolution Aaron Swartz
• rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics proposed resolution Aaron Swartz
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Aaron Swartz
• The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] Brian McBride
• Re: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy Brian McBride

Friday, 26 April 2002

• Minutes for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-26 Graham Klyne
• Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy Patrick Stickler
• Informal f2f in Honolulu? Patrick Stickler
• Regrets for next Friday's concall Patrick Stickler
• Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change Dan Brickley
• Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change Dan Connolly
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Dan Brickley
• Re: Test Cases WD review Jan Grant
• towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change Dan Brickley
• Clarifying the datatyping MT... Patrick Stickler
• Re: doc reviews jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: doc reviews Dan Connolly
• Re: schema Dan Connolly
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Jeremy Carroll
• Re: schema Martyn Horner
• Re: schema Frank Manola
• Test Cases WD review Jeremy Carroll
• comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo Dan Brickley
• schema comments Frank Manola
• Re: doc reviews Dave Beckett
• RE: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: doc reviews jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• status update: webont request for dark triples Brian McBride
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change Dan Brickley
• Schema. (fwd) Jan Grant
• schema Dan Brickley
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change Graham Klyne
• Re: doc reviews Jan Grant
• Re: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test Jan Grant
• Re: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test Jan Grant
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change Patrick Stickler
• Re: doc reviews Martyn Horner
• Re: doc reviews Frank Manola
• Primer status and proposed schedule Frank Manola

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Re: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test Dan Brickley
• rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf:Alt - status Frank Manola
• Re: provisional new MT draft Jan Grant
• Charmod (was RE: Minutes 2002-04-09) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: notation for literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:Alt - status Dave Beckett
• RE: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Pat Hayes
• Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 Pat Hayes
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-26 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: notation for literals Brian McBride
• Re: provisional new MT draft Pat Hayes
• rdf:Alt - status Brian McBride
• Re: notation for literals Pat Hayes
• daml:collection Brian McBride
• Re: reification terminology question Jan Grant
• Re: notation for literals Martyn Horner
• Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 Martyn Horner
• Re: reification terminology question Brian McBride
• Re: Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules Eric Miller
• new issue: rdf-namespace-change Brian McBride
• Re: Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules Brian McBride
• Re: notation for literals Dave Beckett
• test cases review Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 Brian McBride
• Re: notation for literals Dave Beckett
• doc reviews Brian McBride
• Re: notation for literals Brian McBride
• RE: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Jeremy Carroll
• Re: notation for literals Dave Beckett
• rdfms-assertion [was: Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT] Brian McBride
• Re: Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules Dave Beckett
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Brian McBride
• Minutes 2002-04-09 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: provisional new MT draft Jan Grant
• Re: notation for literals Brian McBride
• Fwd: 2003 Technical Plenary DATES: 3-7 March 2003 Brian McBride
• Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules Brian McBride

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: notation for literals Graham Klyne

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• provisional new MT draft Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: weekly call for agenda items Pat Hayes
• Re: reification terminology question Frank Manola
• reification terminology question Pat Hayes
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Dave Beckett
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Dave Beckett
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Aaron Swartz
• notation for literals Pat Hayes
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Pat Hayes
• Re: Test cases added for rdfms-charmod-literals Dave Beckett
• RE: Test cases added for rdfms-charmod-literals Jeremy Carroll
• Test cases added for rdfms-charmod-literals Dave Beckett
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-iri-00.txt Jeremy Carroll
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Jeremy Carroll
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-iri-00.txt Brian McBride
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Graham Klyne
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Graham Klyne
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Pat Hayes
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Pat Hayes
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Dan Connolly
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Pat Hayes
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Pat Hayes
• RE: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Dave Beckett
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Dan Connolly
• RE: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri Dave Beckett
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler

Monday, 22 April 2002

• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-rep resentation) Ronald Daniel
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Graham Klyne
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Pat Hayes
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• suggested wording for removing weasels from MT Pat Hayes
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dave Beckett
• Radically Shrunk RDF Schema (RSRS) Aaron Swartz
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot Dan Brickley
• datatypes WD Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot Dan Connolly
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly
• More test case stuff: Jan Grant
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Graham Klyne
• RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot Dan Brickley
• RE: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Jeremy Carroll
• Test cases WD Jan Grant
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 20 April 2002

• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Graham Klyne
• datatypes cease-fire violated Dan Connolly
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Pat Hayes
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes

Friday, 19 April 2002

• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Jos De_Roo
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Pat Hayes
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) Dan Connolly
• partially described containers: RDF, WebOnt and XML Protocol (SOAP) designs Dan Brickley
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 Brian McBride
• rdfs schedule Dan Brickley
• Re: best way to write triples (was RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19) Dan Connolly
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Patrick Stickler
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Patrick Stickler
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Patrick Stickler
• best way to write triples (was RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Graham Klyne
• Re: Before we go on... Patrick Stickler
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Jos De_Roo
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 Frank Manola
• A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] Brian McBride
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: after hours discussion of dark triples [Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19] Graham Klyne
• Re: Before we go on... Jos De_Roo
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: What is RDF Datatyping? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Graham Klyne
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Patrick Stickler
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Patrick Stickler
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Before we go on... Patrick Stickler
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 Patrick Stickler
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Dan Connolly
• Primer status Frank Manola
• Re: best way to write triples? Pat Hayes
• Re: best way to write triples? Pat Hayes
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Pat Hayes
• Re: What is RDF Datatyping? Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes

Thursday, 18 April 2002

• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Jos De_Roo
• after hours discussion of dark triples [Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? Pat Hayes
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Before we go on... Pat Hayes
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Patrick Stickler
• Re: best way to write triples? Patrick Stickler
• Re: best way to write triples? Patrick Stickler
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Patrick Stickler
• Before we go on... Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• What is RDF Datatyping? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Patrick Stickler
• Fwd: Request for commitment to review Charmod Last Call #2 Brian McBride
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Graham Klyne
• Observers Brian McBride
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Brian McBride
• Dark Triples Brian McBride
• Comment on RDF datatypes draft (fwd) Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Graham Klyne
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Frank Manola
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Jan Grant
• RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Martyn Horner
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo

Wednesday, 17 April 2002

• "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] Dan Connolly
• Re: best way to write triples? Dan Connolly
• Re: best way to write triples? Dave Beckett
• RE: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Ronald Daniel
• best way to write triples? Pat Hayes
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Pat Hayes
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Pat Hayes
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Pat Hayes
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Pat Hayes
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. Jos De_Roo
• Updated RDF Core tests ( rdf:parseType="Literal" rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) Dave Beckett
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Patrick Stickler
• Re: Test respository; work remaining. Dave Beckett
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Graham Klyne
• Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. Jan Grant
• RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Jeremy Carroll
• Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? Patrick Stickler
• RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Re: Test respository; work remaining. Jos De_Roo
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• The point of RDF Datatyping (in case it wasn't clear ;-) Patrick Stickler
• RE: charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Brian McBride
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Re: containers: primer material Graham Klyne
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples Dan Connolly
• RE: charmod-uri Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• Re: containers: primer material Frank Manola
• 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG Patrick Stickler
• RE: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: containers: primer material Jeremy Carroll
• Pats URLs are back Pat Hayes
• RE: charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF datatyping, section 2.1 Patrick Stickler
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF datatyping, section 2.1 Graham Klyne
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples Graham Klyne
• Re: containers: primer material Graham Klyne
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples Graham Klyne
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF datatyping, section 2.1 Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatypes: proposal for abstract Patrick Stickler
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo
• RDF datatyping, section 2.1 Graham Klyne
• RDF Datatypes: proposal for abstract Graham Klyne
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples Jos De_Roo
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples Aaron Swartz
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: charmod-uri Martin Duerst
• containers: primer material Frank Manola
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples Pat Hayes
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Pat Hayes

Monday, 15 April 2002

• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Pat Hayes
• Dark triples, motivating examples Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 14 April 2002

• Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 13 April 2002

• For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. Jan Grant
• Test respository; work remaining. Jan Grant
• Suggestions for Use Cases materials Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping in Dublin Core Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatype Draft Comments Patrick Stickler

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Re: Denotation of datatype values Jos De_Roo
• Datatyping in Dublin Core Aaron Swartz
• Datatype Draft Comments Aaron Swartz
• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-04-12 Graham Klyne
• RDF Core tests for rdf:parseType="Literal" Dave Beckett
• Regrets for 2002-04-19 telecon Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Jos De_Roo
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 Brian McBride
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang Jos De_Roo
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Brian McBride
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Jos De_Roo
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Jan Grant
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Dave Beckett
• Praise for the primer Brian McBride
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Jos De_Roo
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Re: manifests and words for the test cases. Jos De_Roo
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: manifests and words for the test cases. Brian McBride
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Graham Klyne
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo
• manifests and words for the test cases. Jan Grant
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Patrick Stickler
• Re: SVG tools: [was Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 Jos De_Roo
• SVG tools: [was Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty] Brian McBride
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 Brian McBride
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 Eric Miller
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) Dan Connolly
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Dan Brickley
• advising RDF users about &entities; [was: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD] Dan Connolly
• tools (was Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty) Eric Miller
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Brian McBride
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Brian McBride
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Dan Brickley
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Graham Klyne
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Graham Klyne
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Graham Klyne
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• ACTION 2002-04-05#13 done Dave Beckett
• Re: charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: charmod-uri Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• Re: charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• Re: charmod-uri Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Jeremy Carroll
• charmod-uri Jeremy Carroll
• RDFCore WG minutes 2002-04-05 Teleconference Eric Miller
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Brian McBride
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Patrick Stickler
• Re: Completed actions (uri and xquery) Brian McBride
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Patrick Stickler
• rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Patrick Stickler
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Brian McBride
• Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• Re: Denotation of datatype values Jeremy Carroll
• Completed actions (uri and xquery) Jeremy Carroll
• WebOnt F2F news Jeremy Carroll
• containers Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 9 April 2002

• Re: Denotation of datatype values Brian McBride
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Graham Klyne
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00.txt Graham Klyne
• Extension of RDF for inclusion/import in the language Raphael Volz
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler

Monday, 8 April 2002

• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang Dave Beckett
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang Martyn Horner
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Dave Beckett
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang Brian McBride
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Brian McBride
• Re: Denotation of datatype values Brian McBride
• Re: xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" Brian McBride
• Re: xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" Dave Beckett
• xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" Brian McBride
• Denotation of datatype values Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 7 April 2002

• Re: New I-D: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Proposal submissions (was: Re: Range constraints on collection members) Patrick Stickler
• New I-D: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 6 April 2002

• Re: daml:collection Jos De_Roo
• Re: Range constraints on collection members Brian McBride
• Re: daml:collection Brian McBride
• Proposal submissions (was: Re: Range constraints on collection members) Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: pinging about rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests Pat Hayes
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Pat Hayes
• Re: Range constraints on collection members Pat Hayes
• Re: daml:collection Pat Hayes

Friday, 5 April 2002

• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Pat Hayes
• Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach Dave Beckett
• Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang Dave Beckett
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Pat Hayes
• Re: pinging about rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests Dan Connolly
• pinging about rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests Jos De_Roo
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-05 Brian McBride
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review Jos De_Roo
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review Jeremy Carroll
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: appeal for (short) test case review Brian McBride
• Bristol time is 4pm [was Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-05] Brian McBride
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review Jos De_Roo
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review Jeremy Carroll
• Range constraints on collection members Patrick Stickler
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Massimo Marchiori
• Re: appeal for (short) test case review Jos De_Roo
• Test cases for rdfms-rdf-names-use Dave Beckett

Thursday, 4 April 2002

• Re: appeal for (short) test case review Dave Beckett
• Re: daml:collection R.V.Guha
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-05 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• daml:collection Brian McBride
• appeal for (short) test case review Brian McBride
• Re: Issues status update. Graham Klyne
• Re: Issues status update. Graham Klyne
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Graham Klyne
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Pat Hayes
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Pat Hayes
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Brian McBride
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Jeremy Carroll
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Massimo Marchiori
• Issues status update. Brian McBride
• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Graham Klyne
• RE: Charmod-Literal Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Charmod-Literal Brian McBride
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 3 April 2002

• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Pat Hayes
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Pat Hayes
• Charmod-Literal Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Pat Hayes
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Pat Hayes
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Pat Hayes
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft Jeremy Carroll
• RDF Datatyping Working Draft Patrick Stickler
• Re: (draft) minutes from 2002-03-22 teleconf Graham Klyne
• rdfs delay :( Dan Brickley
• (draft) minutes from 2002-03-22 teleconf Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 2 April 2002

• Grey test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 Jos De_Roo
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Graham Klyne

Monday, 1 April 2002

• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Aaron Swartz
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Graham Klyne
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Graham Klyne
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Graham Klyne
• Re: xmlbase error1 Graham Klyne

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 19:17:13 UTC