- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 17 Apr 2002 18:30:21 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 18:04, Pat Hayes wrote: > I ask now because I would like to get it right in what might be the > final version of the MT document. Ah... then about this bit: ------- The use of the phrase "asserted triple" in the third condition is a deliberate weasel-worded artifact, intended to allow an RDF graph or document to contain triples which are being used for some non-assertional purpose. ------- -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20020214/ I suggest it's time to get rid of the weasle-words. The most straightforward thing to do is to strike that text. That's my preference. Otherwise, let's see some test cases for what it means. One option is to resurrect the magic-namespace from M&S 1.0. ---- When an RDF processor encounters an XML element or attribute name that is declared to be from a namespace whose name begins with the string "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" and the processor does not recognize the semantics of that name then the processor is required to skip (i.e., generate no tuples for) the entire XML element, including its content, whose name is unrecognized or that has an attribute whose name is unrecognized. ---- -- http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222 This would reverse our earlier (30th November 2001) decision re para 196: The WG decided to delete the effect of this text from the specification. There is no special processing of elements from the namespace whose URI is http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax. -- http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 19:30:21 UTC