- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 01:39:59 +0200
- To: "Pat Hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: "Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
[...] > No. That is like saying that a Java application is expected to run in > a way that isn't supported by the Java VM. It is *not* expected to > interpret RDF in a way that is inconsistent with the MT. The MT isn't > some arcane piece of mathematics just put there for window-dressing. > It is the reference point for RDF meanings, and moreover it is the > ONLY reference point that is accessible to developers of RDF > inference engines. So any other interpretation placed on an RDF graph > is liable to become invalid as soon as any conforming inference > engine draws any valid RDF conclusions. That would makes RDF > completely irrelevant: it would no longer be a bearer of > machine-accessible information. I will put that on top of my bed -- Jos
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 19:40:40 UTC