- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:27:07 +0100
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 12:48 AM 4/19/02 +0200, Jos De_Roo wrote: >[...] > > > 19: Suggest after hours discussion of dark triples > >Since quite some time I am/remain convinced about *unasserted* triples. >I think to have given (be it brief) evidence of that in >-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0178.html >-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0087.html >I couldn't better explain it than Pat in >-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jan/0195.html >or Tim in >-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2001Jun/0124.html >There is just more in the world than asserting RDF triples and >RDF is too useful to restrict it to that. I note that Tim's approach to nesting seems to be similar to what I've tried to thrash out in [1]. #g -- [1] http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/UsingContextsWithRDF.html ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 05:31:14 UTC