- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:29:27 +0100 (BST)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > To conclude that Jenny's ex:age is ten would be a mistake, an invalid > > inference. We should make this painfully clear to users, so they do > > not get their RDF in a muddle. > > > > Smell the coffee! > > The WG did agree at the f2f that the lack of "jeremy's entailment" was an > issue. > > Pat is speaking wisdom here. "jeremy's entailment" cannot possibly hold if > Jenny's ex:age is the string "10". > > The WG can't have its tidiness cake and eat it. In my* opinion, the cost of having to wrap "...has a lexical representation of..." around my model of RDF properties is painful; "what Jeremy said," basically. jan * insert "humble" here -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Goth isn't dead, it's just lying very still and sucking its cheeks in.
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 05:30:47 UTC