- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 20:51:03 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 06:02 PM 4/4/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >RDF Schema Issues > > * rdfs-constraining-containers: Should it be possible to constrain > the members of a container to be of a given type? I have a vague recollection we'd decided to defer this one?? (i.e. that RDFS 1.0 would provide no such capability.) > * rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property: Clarify whether a Property can have a > subClassOf property, and if so, what that would mean? Doesn't the model theory nail this down? (If you say Property1 rdfs:subClassOf Peoperty2, then one infers that Property1 and Property2 are [also] members of rdfs:Class, and that their class extensions are appropriately related.) > * rdfs-online-char-encoding: There is problem with the character > encoding of the online RDF Schema. Seems like an editorial/publication detail to sort out. > * rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance: Suggestion of clearer > discussion of use of subClass and instance relationships simultaneously. Hmmm... editorial? > * rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics: Must the value of an rdfs:isDefinedBy > property be a schema? I don't know: does anyone? > * rdfs-editorial: General editorial comments. I think editorial matters are most efficiently dealt with by the corresponding editors, rather than group debate. The group can then comment (or not) on the result. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 15:07:23 UTC