Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD

On 2002-04-11 19:53, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:


> The previously announced microschedule at:
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#L473
> 
> shows a first version for review at this week conference call.  This was
> based on your email:
> 
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0379.html
> 
> I guess I misinterpreted the term "rough draft to the WG".

Damn that natural language ;-)

> I take Graham's 
> point about reviewing a moving target.
> 
> How about this for a plan:
> 
>  - detailed review of DT's WD 19th Apr
>  - final review and approve publication 26th Apr

This sounds reasonable.

> That means we need a near final for review, by say Monday.

I can have the near-final draft for review by Tuesday morning EST
(meaning COB Tuesday GMT). That won't include the non-normative
appendices.

Is that acceptable?

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 02:55:50 UTC