- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:58:31 +0300
- To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-04-11 19:53, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > The previously announced microschedule at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#L473 > > shows a first version for review at this week conference call. This was > based on your email: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0379.html > > I guess I misinterpreted the term "rough draft to the WG". Damn that natural language ;-) > I take Graham's > point about reviewing a moving target. > > How about this for a plan: > > - detailed review of DT's WD 19th Apr > - final review and approve publication 26th Apr This sounds reasonable. > That means we need a near final for review, by say Monday. I can have the near-final draft for review by Tuesday morning EST (meaning COB Tuesday GMT). That won't include the non-normative appendices. Is that acceptable? Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 02:55:50 UTC