- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:58:31 +0300
- To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-04-11 19:53, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> The previously announced microschedule at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#L473
>
> shows a first version for review at this week conference call. This was
> based on your email:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0379.html
>
> I guess I misinterpreted the term "rough draft to the WG".
Damn that natural language ;-)
> I take Graham's
> point about reviewing a moving target.
>
> How about this for a plan:
>
> - detailed review of DT's WD 19th Apr
> - final review and approve publication 26th Apr
This sounds reasonable.
> That means we need a near final for review, by say Monday.
I can have the near-final draft for review by Tuesday morning EST
(meaning COB Tuesday GMT). That won't include the non-normative
appendices.
Is that acceptable?
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 02:55:50 UTC