- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:02:44 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: ""Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, ""Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, ""Pat Hayes" <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, ""RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> Observing, and to some extent fearing, the nature of the recent datatypes
> discussion, I was wondering if we could bring some more structure to it
by
> asking for a test case. Then I saw this message from Jos and thought
this
> might be the basis of a test case we could decide on. Is it? Is there
an
> entailment test here?
well we have (an already aging) one
does the merge of the graphs
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p7.nt
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p7s.nt
RDF-RDFS-RDFD-entail
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p8.nt
???
--
Jos
> Brian
>
> ps: Someone (Jos?) has a badly formed email address configured for
Patrick
> - my email server barfs when I try to reply.
>
> "Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
>
> should be
>
> "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
>
> Oh and similarly for PatH and RDFCore for that matter.
>
> B
I think it's indeed our Lotus Notes :-(
PS after some back and forth process with Jan, we have the Manifest files
in
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/
now up and running
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 07:10:03 UTC