RE: appeal for (short) test case review

[...]

> > The answer is a simply B/W ***yes or no***
>
>
> Yes it does, and I support the test case. Sorry about my earlier hiccup.
>
> Can I suggest a minor change that in test0001.nt one of the domains
> and one of the ranges should be assigned to the subproperty not the
> superproperty. One could even add a third domain and range for the
> subproperty.
>
> That's just to completely rule out any sort of non-monotonic defeasible
> reasoning.

I've followed your nice suggestion for test001 in that one of the
domains and one of the ranges is now assigned to the subproperty
It's updated in
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/

thanks Jeremy

--
Jos

Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 08:51:18 UTC