- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:15:16 +0100
- To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jos De_Roo said:
>
> >At 00:04 06/04/2002 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> >
> >>I've created 2 test cases for this issue
> >> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-abouteach
> >>
> >>below
> >> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-abouteach/
> >>
> >>They test failure for
> >>
> >> error001.rdf rdf:aboutEach
> >> error002.rdf rdf:aboutEachPrefix
>
> well, I was looking for (but didn't find) the .nt files
> one could of course argue here, but there are certainly triples
> in those files, and I think we should say which ones
> no? Jan?
As an error case, there are no triples.
Right?
Jan said about this in the manifest form:
[[
negative parser test (input: bad .rdf file)
]]
and this is a negative parser test
Dave
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 09:20:20 UTC