- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:53:33 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I think DaveB was working on a syntax extension following the F2F... #g -- At 09:26 AM 4/24/02 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: >Is there an approved way to indicate the three parts of a literal in >Ntriples? Or should we just take the line that while literals are defined >to have three parts, we will proceed as though they were just strings, >really? I would prefer it if we had a notation which did in fact exactly >reflect our decisions, if only to be able to avoid having weasel-wording >in the spec. For example, right now the MT is obliged to say something >like this: > >"An RDF literal has three parts (a bit, a character string, and a language >tag [@@reference@@]), but we will treat them simply as character strings, >since the other parts of the literal play no role in the model theory." > >which is tacky, to say the least. > >BTW, what is the normative reference to go in there? > >Pat > >-- >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >IHMC (850)434 8903 home >40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax >phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 03:49:53 UTC