- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:01:39 +0100
- To: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sorry Pat you jumped too soon. The version to review isn't published yet. I'll do a more detailed analysis and try and point to changes from the current draft. My comments on the current draft would be something like: - string stuff has been helpful - RDF Core is instance of application of [S] part of charmod that may help in move from CR to PR - IRI stuff unhelpful, because of lack of consensus around IRI draft - Exit criteria for CR need to include sufficiently numerous normalizing transcoders. (More so than usual given the wide applicability of the requirement). I will write something fuller when I have seen the last call WD. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Pat Hayes > Sent: 25 April 2002 15:44 > To: Jeremy Carroll > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 > > > >I am sorry this is so late. > >I forgot! > >(We might need to delay approval until next week). > > > >BRIAN, PAT: note action 19,20,21 (yours and mine) below which Jema lost. > > > > >2002-04-19#21: path review charmod by 31st May > > Well, Ive READ it. It looks fine to me (most impressive). However I > also do not think that my opinion is worth much. So: no problems, but > no expectation that someone else will find none. > > Pat > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax > phayes@ai.uwf.edu > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes > >
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 11:01:53 UTC