Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy]

At 16:21 29/04/2002 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>Jos, I think you're right that it's a misunderstabnding...
>
>I was responding to "We build a rule mechanism", which I understood to be 
>a means to define rules *in RDF* (similar to log:implies in N3), and which 
>I think would be a unacceptably substantial change to RDF at this 
>stage.  If this means simply that we define some extra closure rules, then 
>I withdraw that particular objection.

That's what I meant.  Sorry for the confusing language.

Brian

Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 12:02:47 UTC